The Story of HVRA
Good Neighbours Building a Great Neighbourhood
by Rory ‘Gus' Sinclair, HVRA Chair, 2000-2009
Beginning in the late 1960s and into the early 1970s, Toronto experienced a political sea change and has never been the same since. Those were the days of John Sewell's work in Trefann Court, of our ‘tiny perfect Mayor', David Crombie, of the stopping of the Spadina Expressway, of Jane Jacobs' amazing insights into how a North American city can work, and much more.
This was the time when the notion of Toronto as a collection of neighbourhoods took root and has never really left us. Neighbourhoods came to be considered the lifeblood of a liveable city. Here was stability, a place where families felt safe and interacted with their neighbours, brought up children who went to local schools, and supported local businesses. Without stable neighbourhoods, cities faced the spectre of the ‘doughnut' — the flight of families to the suburbs, a business core that was occupied from 9 to 5 and then abandoned to the poor and homeless at night, leading to the empty core or the hole of the doughnut.
It was in this atmosphere that Toronto's first residents' associations were born. Note the term ‘resident' — no longer were these organizations to be called ratepayers' associations, for the organizations were open to all who were resident, including renters as well as owners. Coupled with this was the support for the founding of such associations by those at City Hall who had become believers in the stable neighbourhood concept. This support was broad-based, encompassing both the political and bureaucratic sides.
One of the earliest of these new associations was the Sussex Ulster Residents' Association [SURA], the forerunner of HVRA. Still resident in Harbord Village are several of those founding members, and you can read about them and the early days of SURA elsewhere on this site.
I moved into Harbord Village in 1990, although I had lived on both Brunswick and Major when I was a student at the U of T in the mid '60s. I became a member of the SURA board in 1991 and remained on the board until SURA folded itself officially into HVRA in 2000. In 1991, Bob Barnett was chair, succeeded in 1993 by Catherine Cragg, who was chair until 1999, when Curt Oliver assumed the position.
At this time SURA was pretty thin on the ground — there were too few people trying to do too many things. In addition, there had been some divisive issues that SURA, and perhaps no one else, could have resolved: the ongoing dispute with Doctors Hospital regarding its construction plans, the introduction of the traffic maze south of Harbord, and the use of the former Doctors Hospital as a temporary shelter for the homeless. There were deep divisions in the neighbourhood on these and other matters. Membership in SURA declined as a result.
In 1999, at SURA's AGM, George Stephenson moved that a committee be struck to write a new constitution for a rejuvenated residents' association and to report back in six months' time to SURA. The committee, comprising David Wurfel, Sue Dexter, Gordon Brown, Celia Denov, Cyril Greenland and George Stevenson as convener, set to work. The committee did an excellent job and wrote the blueprint for what would become HVRA.
In the Spring of 2000, copies of the new constitution were delivered to every residence in SURA, indicating a date for the meeting where this would be presented for adoption.
This general meeting was held in May 2000 at the JCC at Spadina and Bloor. It was well attended — just short of 80 people — and the constitution was vigorously and robustly debated. In the end, it was adopted by a large majority of attendees.
A second motion, that SURA fold itself and its assets into the new Harbord Village Residents' Association, was also passed by a large majority.
A slate of officers was presented and elected, with Curt Oliver as president, David Wurfel as secretary and Margaret Smith as treasurer. Finally, the first area reps were elected and the new board officially constituted. The first meeting was set for September 2000 — HVRA was on its way!
Birth of HVRA
We began with 30 paid members from the former SURA and about $800 in the bank. Now, in January 2007, HVRA has just short of 400 paid members and about $16,000 in the bank. In the intervening six years, we have always had a full and active board. The list of our initiatives and achievements is ambitious, but more important, HVRA has a culture not just of enthusiasm but also of getting things done.
What are the ingredients of this success?
How we work
The most salient and innovative points of the new constitution are the following:
1: The Area Reps
The neighbourhood was divided into five geographic areas, which would become the backbone of how HVRA would organize itself. Each area sends two representatives to the board, and those area reps plus the executive ARE the board.
This geographic arrangement has made running the organization much easier — for each part of the catchment area is represented on the board — and we have eyes and ears throughout the Village. This is useful for practically anything we do, from zoning issues to delivering flyers about upcoming meetings.
Out of this organization grew the concept of neighbourhood caucuses, now an important part of every HVRA general meeting. Members from each area meet and discuss their local issues with the area reps chairing the caucus. All concerns are compiled in a list, used to guide the board in setting its various initiatives in the coming months.
2: The Constitutional and Nominations Committee
The CNC comprises four members of the community at large who are generally recognized as having been involved in our community over the years. No two members can be from the same geographic area. The CNC is responsible for two very important things:
3: The Committee Structure and Conveners
A third and last feature is the way the constitution allows for various tasks to be done by committees of the board. There is provision for the board to establish committees for various tasks within the board, i.e. made up of members of the board and reporting to the board. In addition, the board has the power to appoint individual members of HVRA who are not board members to head committees to and report back to the board. Individuals so appointed are called "conveners." Such extra-board initiatives have been: the heritage conservation committees, The treeing the village initiative, and various submissions to OMB.
Goals and Aspirations of HVRA
Here is what our Constitution has to say on this subject:
Gord Brown, our Treasurer for 6 years, summarized this well in our slogan Good Neighbours Building a Great Neighbourhood. How does HVRA carry out this mission statement? What are the things we do that reflect these goals? Here are a few thoughts:
1: Building Community and Sense of Community:
Every time we put people together, whether it be for the semi-annual neighbourhood clean-ups, the committee-work for the Fall Fair or attending the Fall Fair itself, local meetings with residents on local development/permit issues, the Heritage Conservation process - and many more.. relationships are necessarily forged between and amongst members of our neighbourhood. HVRA instituted the Neighbourhood Builder Awards which have recognized various aspects of working for and with the neighbourhood, namely: negotiating difficult development issues, the most beautiful gardens, the most sensitive renovation.
2: Improving Safety in the Neighbourhood
Such initiatives might include having experts come to our General Meetings to discuss Fire Safety, Policing issues, Insurance coverage.
It might be the introduction of pinch points on Robert Street at Russell; Robert Street at Bloor;
3: Considerations for the Stability and Enhancement of the Assets of Our Community